What I am
about to reveal may cost me a lawsuit or a jail term or whatever the lawyers
wish to do. Honestly I couldn’t care
less; not any more after having slogged my whole life trying to make two ends
meet. I shall be sixty-one this September and have no idea whether
my sons will ever get their rightful heirloom – I found there are many false
documents legalised to support the opposite party’s false claims.
Both cases
mentioned here are over and judgements passed years ago. However, I am questioning one vital factor –
do lawyers follow any code of ethics? Do
they adhere to any moral compunction by default or is it left to personal choice? In the first case I mention here, I also want
to know whether a judge has the prerogative to smell something wrong and find
out the truth before passing any judgement.
I know the courtroom drama is all about hard-core evidence and not
emotions – but the judgement is about humans and for humans who inherently have
emotions.
The first
is about my divorce from Ashok Bose facilitated by Tarun Kumar Banerjee – case
no filed in the year 1981 and the decree given out in the year 1982.
One evening
in the year 1981 Buddha Bose (my then father-in-law) and Rooma Bose (my then
sister-in-law) asked me to get ready and come along with them somewhere. Did as told without questioning, as usual,
leaving my 3 kids with Swapna (my late brother-in-law’s widow) her 2 kids and
Bhabani (a Nepali maid). We went to a
house in kalighat, which turned out to be a lawyer’s chamber – more explicitly
Mr. Tarun Banerjee’s Chamber. Sitting in
this room Buddha Bose said he wanted me to divorce Ashok and then he would
adopt me so I need never leave the house.
He said it was imperative that I take divorce so Ashok, whom he had
thrown out with the help of Bulu Ghosh and some big shot in the bureaucracy,
would not make an excuse of coming back to the house to visit me or the
kids. The word divorce did raise
questions in my mind; however, as I and my children were completely at the
mercy of Buddha Bose and his daughter I agreed to whatever they proposed. My only priority in life at that time was to
keep my children safe and sound in their rightful home, at the feet of their
grandfather.
Thereafter,
I would often be sent to the lawyer’s chamber if and when he wished to clarify
any point or get my signature. Of course
these visits were always paid for by Buddha Bose, since I had no income or bank
balance. Even the lawyer’s fees were
sent through me from time to time. By
the time the divorce was more or less final, things were changing at home – the
attitudes of the family members gradually became distant and I started feeling
like a most unwelcome guest in my in-law’s place. I cannot put my finger on any exact event or
situation but one fine day I was simply asked to leave the house with the kids
by Rooma. Now the house we were in was
actually Rooma’s, it was a gift from her mother and the house that was settled for
the grandsons was at the time leased to Reserve Bank of India; and Buddha Bose
lived on the roof where he had built a well-fitted out flat-cum-pooja
room. He did not come down from there
for seven days while I waited to ask him where I would go with the 3
children. There was no way of contacting
him and I was not given the key to the main door. Finally, after being asked to leave
practically every night I collected our few belongings and left for my parents’
place in a taxi, taking it for granted that I would take the fare from my
parents.
The day the
decree was given I was called by Tarun Banerjee to come and collect it from his
chambers in the evening. He was aware I
was no longer in New Alipore. When I
reached his chambers there was no other client in the room. He smiled and asked me to sign a few papers
before handing over the decree – the first in the bunch was Bank of Tokyo name
or account withdrawal form. I asked him
why I should do that. He replied if I
did not sign all the papers as asked there would be scandalous rumours spread
about me in Calcutta
and I would find it very difficult to live here. I remember going red and horrified with such
low-class insinuations I simply signed all the papers without even seeing what
I was signing. I distinctly remember
Tarun Banerjee’s last words as he handed me the decree – “You can get married again
tomorrow."
I went to
meet Mr. Tarun Banerjee recently after I came to Calcutta – he is aged now. As he mentioned he is 76 years but he has
done well for himself; he is a renowned divorce lawyer in Calcutta and his chambers in Fern Road is plush
and air-conditioned. At first he posed
not to recognise me (last we met was in 1982 and it is 2013 now) and then said
I used to be a very thin young girl in those days (regular yoga practice kept
me in form). Once recognition dawned on
him I asked him a couple of questions.
One – who was his client during my divorce case? He replied Buddha Bose. Next I asked him did he not wonder as to why
would I, a 29 year old woman with 3 children seek divorce, especially since I
had no job, no money, and no boyfriend.
Mr. Banerjee said he had asked Buddha Bose why this divorce and got the
reply that he, Buddha Bose would free me from Ashok Bose, his son and then do
some financial settlement for his grandchildren and me. I asked the esteemed lawyer why he made me sign
a sheaf of papers and threaten me with defamation etc. when he knew very well
that I had been thrown out of the house by my in-laws. Mr.Banerjee ‘lost his memory again’ and said
he did not remember the incident.
Mr.Banerjee
then asked me the reason for my visit (since time is money and there was some
financially-sound clients sitting in the waiting room). I showed him the deed of settlement which named
me as trustee for the property bequeathed to my sons by their grandmother, late
Ava Rani Bose in 1974. He got interested
and said he would love to read the whole thing if I could give him a typed
version of the deed, which is an original certified copy from the registration
office in Dalhousie. I got it in
1998. I have not gone back for fear of
my eyes welling up with tears again with all the pain and hurt in his
presence.
No comments:
Post a Comment